It has stormed around NRK program social security office in recent days, after the Tuesday sent a pornographic video which should imagine presenter Thomas Seltzer who had sex with a fitness guru Kari Jaquesson (under the name Kari Jack-off son ).
Other parts of the controversial element in the video at the top.
The video came just two months after The Social Security recently had a pornographic performances that got strong reactions – including from Kari Jaquesson (52).
– Had to call home and prepare junior
When she heard that NRK had done it again, did not know Kari Jaquesson what she would think.
– Disbelief, I think is the right word to use. Is it true, is it possible? she says to Good evening Norway Saturday.
– The first thing I had to do was to call home and prepare Junior. I have minor children, and I had to call home and prepare them for what would come, telling Jaquesson, who was on holiday in France when the element was shown.
trygdekontor: Thomas Seltzer accused of having gone far out of line with new porn ordering. Photo: NRK
Shall report
Now both Jaquesson and women’s group Ottar report NRK element.
– I want this to be investigated, so we’ll see what coming out of it. I hope and believe that the police take this review seriously, says Jaquesson.
NRK does take reviews with great tranquility.
– Anyone can the police for anything. We feel confident that legal in this matter. Pornography is not illegal in Norway. And we have not made pornography. It is important to emphasize that we have made a parody of pornography, says Erik Sandberg Ingstad, project manager in social security office.
– Do not violated the law
It is uncertain if the reviews really covered by the legislation, or whether social security office can hide under the derogation of art. I Penal Code Section 204 , is the following:
requires legislative changes: Unless NRK convicted of porn order, Kari Jaquesson require an amendment so that it can not happen again. Photo: Stella Pictures.
Tell us:
We remunerates good celebrity tips
“With pornography refers in this paragraph sexual depictions that are offensive or otherwise is likely to seem human degrading or violated, including sexual depictions where use is made of corpses, animals, violence and coercion. As pornography is not considered sexual depictions that must be considered justifiable from an artistic, scientific, informative or similar purposes. “
– In my opinion, it is obvious that this relationship is not affected by this provision. NRK has not broken the law, says lawyer and guest in social security office, Anine Kierulf.
Will require an amendment
Jaquesson not agree.
– The law is also about discretion. We’ll see. That’s all I can say, says Kari.
And if NRK should not be convicted, will Jaquesson attempt to ensure that this can not happen again.
– Let’s say that this is being reviewed and the case is dropped. Then we have at least very good material to require an amendment.
Happy-Tom has not responded to TV2 inquiries.
No comments:
Post a Comment