Those who have fought their way through a total or part of the work “My Struggle” will know that Knausgård’s literary alter ego struggle ein fierce battle both with inner demons and with the family that itself requires his time and stalling concentration when he most of all wanted to write . The artist was caught in EiT cage of everyday life medical duties; all those small trivial things øydela it eine, great.
In this book’s tone ein poured another one here, the project is to show that life can be good and that it is inconceivable Much to rejoice over in large and not least in the least. We meet ein reconciled narrator who rules over their children and who find it meaningful: to maintain holding house and garden. Can it be great literature of that?
Chewing gum and daguerreotypes
It can, and it has been partially. The book is made up of three letters that faces directly to the enno ufødde her daughter in which he presents the family and, indeed, life. The rest of the book is small texts explaining less INDIVIDUAL things of very different kinds, like teeth, gum, Fluger and vomiting, it will say phenomenon a child will become familiar with the relatively tidleg. But here also fine-texts on issues that are most interesting for washing the group, such as daguerreotypes, oral sex and Flaubert’s “Madame Bovary.” So also book has EiT pronounced two aims:
For those who have read “My Struggle” will perhaps the last sentence in the quote commemorating the very first sentence in the work: “For the heart is life easy.” Such simple pleasures for sensing all abilities should ein not underestimate, but I denominator it to illustrate that despite the fact that this book has a wholly anna format and a completely anna device than before books, so fine-it ein continuity.
Knausgårdske subsequent payment
It is partly linguistic. It can also appear as liberal perspective in things studies, where tensions between nature and culture, or between the disgust doctor and the fascinating can be seen in games. And the core appears in dei painstaking description strings, not least of nature and art. Father, who was jealous and moody as the gamal testament doctor Yahweh in “My Struggle”, getting here comet advocated through Presteigne diary entry in which he describes this say large Einsemd, a Einsemd fortel jaren partially know att in itself as he walks around in his little kingdom Father gummistövlar.
Dei small things texts are of highly variable quality duck. Attempt to undo Gjere a toilet bowl, fingers or extends the piper not my picture of the phenomenon in particular, and I sit at with a sense that it is not as large as is at stake, that it is not so important. Language is also unevenly. It may ache as if it elles wordy writer is poor in synonym that describes dei bright aspects of life, and broad, general words like “joy,” “good” and “nice” dominates more than yes- well is.
Frog Perspective
But occasionally relatively trifling texts, no such small Lysande section where nærveret the thing turns against ein. Once the details get back colors and shades, when things get skins and showing off, it happens something. When text levers himself from hyper realism and into dei large perspektiva in texts as “frames” or “Frogs” occurs glimpse the typical knausgårdske effect where the little thing exceed their Eigne borders and become a roadway into brooding over dei large reworded.
With all that said, I have to enclose to it being a bit surprised that this should be the first of a total of four books of the same kind. I can not loveliest that I need three to but ok, I’m willing to let me above indicate, when “winter” core.
No comments:
Post a Comment